djzehos
Hi,
BPM detection seems accurate for most tracks, but for tracks like hardcore or any style with a bpm above 150/160 seems to be divided in 2. So a track that's clearly 164 is considered to be at 82.
Does anybody else have this problem? Is it going to be fixed?
It seems odd because if I set the BPM manually, I noticed the limit was 200 (seems reasonnable, although I think 250 would be better) so in theory, it should detect 164, not 82.
Thanks.
BPM detection seems accurate for most tracks, but for tracks like hardcore or any style with a bpm above 150/160 seems to be divided in 2. So a track that's clearly 164 is considered to be at 82.
Does anybody else have this problem? Is it going to be fixed?
It seems odd because if I set the BPM manually, I noticed the limit was 200 (seems reasonnable, although I think 250 would be better) so in theory, it should detect 164, not 82.
Thanks.
Posted Thu 11 Mar 04 @ 4:19 pm