I have seen discussion here in the past about the desirability of having the capability to use longer loops in Atomix. It seems there is always a claim that this would use too much processing power or memory.
I don't know what system my Pioneer CDJ-700 player uses but you can loop the entire CD if you want to and it certainly does not have any substantial processing power behind it. All you do is set the start cue point for a loop, set the end point and let it run. You can then edit the two points to adjust the length of the loop.
If all you need is a command to remember a start and finish cue point and then play the data between them repeatedley why should it require a lot of memory? I don't see that you need to buffer all that data, just where to start and finish and repeat the cycle.
mike
www.audiopyle.com
I don't know what system my Pioneer CDJ-700 player uses but you can loop the entire CD if you want to and it certainly does not have any substantial processing power behind it. All you do is set the start cue point for a loop, set the end point and let it run. You can then edit the two points to adjust the length of the loop.
If all you need is a command to remember a start and finish cue point and then play the data between them repeatedley why should it require a lot of memory? I don't see that you need to buffer all that data, just where to start and finish and repeat the cycle.
mike
www.audiopyle.com
Posted Sat 10 Aug 02 @ 10:39 pm
NaDeR
you will need alot of memory to do that on the pc it could be done they just didnt do it!
NaDeR
NaDeR
Posted Sun 11 Aug 02 @ 9:17 pm