Nicotux
ʕ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°ʔ these are the same ugly icons with swapped color & black ʕ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°ʔ
Posted Fri 12 Jul 19 @ 10:46 pm
wildcountryclub
djjohnnyrox wrote :
Other than the icons being uglier I could deal with the text either way...... And i usually bitch about everything! that being said hopefully the powers that be will allow a check box which will give us the choice between modern or classic text/icons
that choice is really all i'm asking for... seriously. just the choice to make life a little easier
Posted Fri 12 Jul 19 @ 11:53 pm
wildcountryclub
THANK YOU!
Posted Wed 24 Jul 19 @ 5:27 pm
Adion
Shell icons is a different option, it shows windows folder icons instead of vdj ones.
There will probably still be new icons in the future, but the ones you saw in the previous early access release were not completely finished yet
There will probably still be new icons in the future, but the ones you saw in the previous early access release were not completely finished yet
Posted Wed 24 Jul 19 @ 5:35 pm
groovindj
Yes, shell icons has been there for a long time (since release?).
On the subject of shell icons, a user was recently wondering why he couldn't display a picture on a folder, and locodog said he could if he set VDJ to use shell icons.
However, doing that doesn't seem to pick up any image assigned to a folder by the OS. Is it supposed to? Where is VDJ getting the shell icons from, if not the OS?
On the subject of shell icons, a user was recently wondering why he couldn't display a picture on a folder, and locodog said he could if he set VDJ to use shell icons.
However, doing that doesn't seem to pick up any image assigned to a folder by the OS. Is it supposed to? Where is VDJ getting the shell icons from, if not the OS?
Posted Wed 24 Jul 19 @ 6:55 pm
wildcountryclub
whichever. I like being able to clearly see and discern them again without having to shove my face closer to the screen
Posted Wed 24 Jul 19 @ 7:05 pm
locoDog
groovindj wrote :
...locodog said he could if he set VDJ to use shell icons.?
I was mistaken on that one.
Posted Thu 25 Jul 19 @ 12:49 am
groovindj
It's a natural assumption that it would function that way. Maybe it used to, but now it seems to only half heartedly do it.
Posted Thu 25 Jul 19 @ 7:51 am
PhantomDeejay
It still shows the icon that the OS shows.
BUT: The user must make sure the icon he's using has encapsulated all the sizes.
In other words the icon itself must have encapsulated images for 16x16, 32x32, 64x64, e.t.c.
If the icon used by the user is missing the 16x16 picture then he'll see the generic Windows folder icon, not his custom one.
PS: VirtualDJ never showed the "picture" of a folder. But it always showed custom icons
BUT: The user must make sure the icon he's using has encapsulated all the sizes.
In other words the icon itself must have encapsulated images for 16x16, 32x32, 64x64, e.t.c.
If the icon used by the user is missing the 16x16 picture then he'll see the generic Windows folder icon, not his custom one.
PS: VirtualDJ never showed the "picture" of a folder. But it always showed custom icons
Posted Thu 25 Jul 19 @ 8:49 am