djragman
Hello everyone,
is there a way to keep the grid-corrections, made with the BPM-Editor, and the Automix-POI's if I have to rescan the files ?
Perhaps an option to "lock" those entries.
is there a way to keep the grid-corrections, made with the BPM-Editor, and the Automix-POI's if I have to rescan the files ?
Perhaps an option to "lock" those entries.
Posted Thu 29 Dec 16 @ 4:35 pm
DJ Varium
1+
Posted Thu 29 Dec 16 @ 5:15 pm
Djratedxxx919
a very old request that has never been implemented.
Posted Thu 29 Dec 16 @ 8:05 pm
djragman
I know, but with some Feedback, they will perhaps do it ;-)
Posted Fri 30 Dec 16 @ 8:15 am
music234
1+ from me.
Posted Fri 30 Dec 16 @ 9:08 am
esgoez
very good.
1+++
Posted Fri 30 Dec 16 @ 10:34 am
Djratedxxx919
wish you luck, do a search and see how long we wished for this option
Posted Fri 30 Dec 16 @ 11:51 am
Benz Werner
1+
Posted Fri 30 Dec 16 @ 12:15 pm
PachN
+1
Maybe it is better to implement a "Rescan Gain" option. Because that is what you probably want to achieve.
Rescanning the complete track and creating a new waveform would make your changes to the grid and automix POIs completely useless, because they are now (potentially) offset.
Maybe it is better to implement a "Rescan Gain" option. Because that is what you probably want to achieve.
Rescanning the complete track and creating a new waveform would make your changes to the grid and automix POIs completely useless, because they are now (potentially) offset.
Posted Fri 30 Dec 16 @ 4:25 pm
Adion
Why would you want to scan a file again that has already been scanned, if not because you made a mistake and want to reset it?
Posted Fri 30 Dec 16 @ 5:02 pm
djnice :o)
PachN wrote :
+1
Maybe it is better to implement a "Rescan Gain" option. Because that is what you probably want to achieve.
Rescanning the complete track and creating a new waveform would make your changes to the grid and automix POIs completely useless, because they are now (potentially) offset.
Maybe it is better to implement a "Rescan Gain" option. Because that is what you probably want to achieve.
Rescanning the complete track and creating a new waveform would make your changes to the grid and automix POIs completely useless, because they are now (potentially) offset.
+1
Posted Fri 30 Dec 16 @ 11:06 pm
Wurlitzer.sk
+1
Posted Sun 01 Jan 17 @ 3:00 pm
locoDog
Adion wrote :
Why would you want to scan a file again that has already been scanned, if not because you made a mistake and want to reset it?
Maybe rescanning with the other key detection.
Posted Sun 01 Jan 17 @ 8:24 pm
Adion
You don't need to rescan for that
Posted Sun 01 Jan 17 @ 9:58 pm
Fruit
Sometimes you want to rescan for bpm with the brand new bpm detector, but you want to keep the 1st beat where you've set it previously. Could apply to a few other properties, maybe.
[EDIT] 1st beat manually set should even help the bpm detector to adjust things.
[EDIT] 1st beat manually set should even help the bpm detector to adjust things.
Posted Mon 02 Jan 17 @ 12:07 am
Djratedxxx919
Though we all might rescan our files for different reasons, Its felt to be unnecessary so this feature will not happen.
Posted Mon 02 Jan 17 @ 12:10 am
groovindj
Djratedxxx919 wrote :
Though we all might rescan our files for different reasons
But for what reasons? That's all he's asking.
List some (or all) of the reasons, and if there's a valid one - bingo!
Posted Mon 02 Jan 17 @ 10:43 am
Djratedxxx919
groovindj wrote :
But for what reasons? That's all he's asking.
List some (or all) of the reasons, and if there's a valid one - bingo!
Djratedxxx919 wrote :
Though we all might rescan our files for different reasons
But for what reasons? That's all he's asking.
List some (or all) of the reasons, and if there's a valid one - bingo!
Each person will have their own reasons, some do it just because they can. The other softwares to realize DJs will reanalyze for reasons only important to them, They have consistency checks and analysis lock. Just because they understand DJs do things just because they are DJs, whether they agree or not.
Posted Mon 02 Jan 17 @ 12:29 pm
groovindj
Djratedxxx919 wrote :
Each person will have their own reasons
OK - and your reasons are.....?
I'm beginning to think you can't come up with a valid reason here.
Posted Mon 02 Jan 17 @ 2:08 pm
Djratedxxx919
groovindj wrote :
OK - and your reasons are.....?
I'm beginning to think you can't come up with a valid reason here.
Djratedxxx919 wrote :
Each person will have their own reasons
OK - and your reasons are.....?
I'm beginning to think you can't come up with a valid reason here.
you didnt finish the statement, it finishes with "just because they can" Its not even rescanning its locking the scan already completed. Just like consistency scans(what I wish for) its just a security thing.
Posted Mon 02 Jan 17 @ 6:24 pm
