Quick Sign In:  

Forum: VirtualDJ 8.0 Technical Support

Topic: Batch mode BPM etc analysis does not work correctly

This topic is old and might contain outdated or incorrect information.

I mentioned this in another thread but I think it needs it's own thread as a bug report.

If I select a bunch of tracks (40+ for instance), right click and select 'Batch', 'Analyze for BPM etc' it scans the tracks and I can see it change the values of a number of tracks to an 'INCORRECT' value. Tracks that were previously scanned and given a value of 128 BPM are changed to 122 BPM. Also the beatgrid markers underneath the waveform do not align with the peaks anymore.

If I then individually select each track and 'reanalyze' the BPM's it correct's itself to the correct BPM's and the beatgrid markers under the waveform align underneath the peaks.

It is repeatable. I can provide a video of this happening if you like.

Unless I am missing something of course.

EDIT: This is also happening to key detection. I selected a bunch of tracks and scanned them. One of the tracks keys changed. So I scanned them again. The key changed back. I scan them again and it changes once more. Flipping back and forth between one key and the other. If I scan that one track on its own the key never changes.
 

Posted Sat 24 May 14 @ 8:08 pm
I can confirm this. Have sent upstairs.
 

Posted Sat 24 May 14 @ 8:41 pm
BraenzuPRO InfinityModeratorMember since 2007
1++

Braenzu
 

Posted Sun 25 May 14 @ 6:38 am
jopinhoPRO InfinityMember since 2012
Hi,
I have the same problem, i have the map Itunes with all the playlist-Analyze for BPM-, and now i have some dubbel tracks and the tracks are not in de right order, even
there are tracks in the wrong maps????
What's going wrong, what can i do
Best regards,
Jopinho
 

Posted Sun 25 May 14 @ 6:52 am
Have the same Problem!
 

Posted Sun 25 May 14 @ 8:56 am
djebouPRO InfinityMember since 2005
Having the same problem. any fix yet?
 

Posted Mon 26 May 14 @ 6:09 pm
should be fixed in an update out real soon..
 

Posted Mon 26 May 14 @ 6:46 pm
ewitlesPRO InfinityMember since 2006
Does that mean a new rescan is in order?
 

Posted Mon 26 May 14 @ 11:29 pm
Yes. You would have to rescan in 8, anyway. I would wait to confirm that the issue has been addressed, before a mass scan.
 

Posted Mon 26 May 14 @ 11:56 pm
vjmundyPRO InfinityMember since 2014
+1
 

Posted Tue 27 May 14 @ 7:29 am
RobRoyPRO InfinitySenior staffMember since 2012
Issue should be fixt now...

Build 1814:
-Fix batch-analyze sometimes giving wrong bpm results
-logUnsuccessful searches works with CU disabled
-Fix renaming of virtual folders
-Files scanned in order when added to automix

 

Posted Tue 27 May 14 @ 9:15 am
RobRoy wrote :
Issue should be fixt now...

Build 1814:
-Fix batch-analyze sometimes giving wrong bpm results
-logUnsuccessful searches works with CU disabled
-Fix renaming of virtual folders
-Files scanned in order when added to automix


Uh!

So how come my VDJ upgraded today from build 1802 to 1806 and not to 1814?

Where is the manual handler to force it to update?
 

Posted Tue 27 May 14 @ 11:07 am
RobRoyPRO InfinitySenior staffMember since 2012
1814 is a Beta Build, being released a bit earlier. If you want also test that Beta Build Releases, just sign up under "My Account" right at the bottom " Get Beta Builds" and you will get a automatic update as soon as there is a new build
 

Posted Tue 27 May 14 @ 11:55 am
Okay, I see. Thought that my updater was not walking synchronic.
 

Posted Tue 27 May 14 @ 12:44 pm
RobRoyPRO InfinitySenior staffMember since 2012
that´s why i replied....;-)
 

Posted Tue 27 May 14 @ 1:30 pm
ewitlesPRO InfinityMember since 2006
Well, I rescanned my library from scratch - meaning the database was not imported from 7. Now I have no gigs coming up and the unit can happily scan away.

So that would be recommended? If so, I'll just delete the database and have it rebuild. When safe of course.)
 

Posted Wed 28 May 14 @ 8:56 pm
I would scan a couple of small batches first, to make sure the batch scan problem has been fixed. I would not be in a hurry to delete anything. Just copy, and hold on for awhile.
 

Posted Thu 29 May 14 @ 1:53 am
metrixPRO InfinityMember since 2007
It's better now but, it´s slow and i have high cpu usage in the red area.
 

Posted Thu 29 May 14 @ 4:23 am


(Old topics and forums are automatically closed)